SEIA opposes the extension of tariffs in the Trump era, stating that it is not an effective way to hinder the growth of the entire solar sector and drive new manufacturing investments.
Hanwha Q CELLS USA, Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc. , And Mission Solar Energy are the latest companies to ask the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) to extend import tariffs on crystalline silicon solar (CSPV) cells.
The petition was made under Section 204 (c) of the Trade Act of 1974 and Subpart F of Part 206 of the ITC’s Rules of Practice and Procedures. Both companies said they represent the domestic industry that manufactures CSPV cells and modules and are therefore in a position to file petitions.
A few days ago, Auxin Solar and Suniva formally asked ITC will extend solar charges for another four years.
Mamun Rashid, co-founder and chief executive officer of Auxin, said: Sun. Rashid said Auxin is “working to rebuild its solar supply chain” and expects policymakers to “commit to green energy independence and the consequent high-income manufacturing promise.” And submitted the petition.
Auxin Solar said the extension petition would encourage the ITC to determine if safeguard bailouts continue to be needed and if there is evidence that the industry is making positive adjustments to import competition. The ITC will report the decision to President Biden by 8 December.
I need more time
In a separate 420-page filing on August 4, Hanwha Q-CELLS USA, LG Electronics USA, and Mission Solar Energy will come into force in 2018, and both companies will make their energy sector carbon-free by 2035. He said more time would be needed to “complete the adjustments” to promote domestic module production, which they called “important” to the administration’s goals.
They said that the bailouts the domestic industry received through tariffs were import stockpiles before the tariffs came into effect, the economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, continued sales of imports, increased input costs and tariffs. It was “partially damaged”. Used to create modules.
The two companies also said that the overall effectiveness of tariffs was “significantly limited” by excluding double-sided products. This is said to have “opened the door to tax exemption for large imports and the return of low-priced modules” just months after the new CSPV module plant went into production.
The three companies said the current tariff quota of 2.5 GW per year, which they said was “appropriate” during the first three years of tariff enforcement, would need to be adjusted in the future. They said that the “appropriate” quotient in line with domestic module production is “essential to the survival of module producers” and is the prospect of new investment in CSPV module manufacturing.
Opposition to SEIA
In an interview with Solar power magazineJohn Smirnow, General Counsel and Vice President of Market Strategy at the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), said industry groups are still opposed to tariffs. He quoted the figures that SEIA presented to the ITC as part of an interim review of pricing. This indicates that solar power is being developed, which is about 2GW less than previously predicted.
He said the claim that tariffs would create jobs for 45,000 people was “roughly and humorously out of the question.” He fixed the actual number of new jobs created as a result of tariffs below 2,000 through expansion at “three discreet facilities.”
Tariffs are not an effective incentive to hinder growth across the PV sector and encourage new manufacturing investments, Smirnow said. He said business investment relies on a period of 5 to 10 years rather than a four-year opportunity.
He called for a series of federal manufacturing aids to support domestic production. The suite includes a long-term extension of investment tax credits and the addition of a direct payment mechanism to enhance demand certainty. It also includes capital investment to help the United States compete in the global market for investment dollars. He said the use of low-cost loans and manufacturing tax credits is a useful tool for that purpose.
And Smirnow called for long-term domestic production support to bring more parts of the solar supply chain to the United States. He produced everything from glass to junction boxes to inverters in the United States. Manufacturing tax credit Similar to the one proposed by Senator John Osov (D-GA).
Mr. Smirnow warned that the price was due to expire at midnight on February 6, and that “billions of dollars” worth of contracts had been signed. He said that extended rates could result in project delays and cancellations.
In the ITC petition, Hanwha Q CELLS USA, LG Electronics USA, and Mission Solar Energy said that extending tariffs at the “best possible” tariff rate for another four years would “continue health for US manufacturers. Is essential for survival. “
“All members of the newly revitalized US industry will be exposed to a new wave of harmful imports,” they said, if tariffs were left to expire. Without extensions, planned investments in equipment and workforce, new capacity expansions, and product innovations “must be put on hold or may never happen,” they said.
This content is copyrighted and cannot be reused. If you would like to work with us and reuse some of our content, please contact us below. email@example.com..
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2021/08/05/three-more-companies-ask-the-itc-to-extend-solar-tariffs-for-four-more-years/ Three more companies ask ITC to extend solar prices for another four years – pv Magazine USA